Carnal Carnivorous Californication
If there ever was a show that reeked of a high school boys’ locker room or the improbable scenarios of moist, nighttime delusion, Showtime’s Californication is it. Loud, crass, bawdy, with some heart, occasional soul, but mostly lots and lots of other body parts (and I don’t mean arms and legs), it’s cable TV at its randiest. It is, after all, premiere cable, code for “great stories with naked bodies and enough sex to bump the brink of porn.” Which can be fun in the right hands. The Tudors. The Sopranos. Hung. But in the hands of Executive Producers Tom Kapinos and David Duchovny, Californication is a study in the kind of panting, hyperbolic male fantasy that is completely bereft of reality, particularly when it comes to women.
I was an early fan. Loved the insouciance, the irreverence, the utter anarchy of it all, and The Graduate ending of that first season was laugh-out-loud exhilarating. I enjoyed David Duchovny’s slacker charm. LOVED Natascha McElhone. Found Evan Handler and Pamela Adlon’s schtick funny/crass and completely over-the-top. Madeleine Martin was uniquely effective, if a bit one-note, and the stunt casting was often memorable — and not always in a good way, particularly Kathleen Turner’s sticky, sleazy turn as Sue Collini and Rick Springfield’s inexplicably unlikable version of himself. The show has been, in turn, profane, cheeky, contemptuous, and wry, but unfortunately none of this has kept it from the bane of series television: becoming yawningly predictable and downright silly. And like that relationship you hold on to because of that first great year, I’ve stuck it out, too often wondering why. It may be time to let go.
The problem? Delusional sexual oversaturation.
Hard to fathom, particularly on a premiere cable show supposedly based the alter ego of rock star author, Charles Bukowski, but much like the folly of eating chocolates to the point of gut-churning aversion, Californication’s obsession with all things sexual – the relentless, inescapable menu of every word, phrase, or act ever imagined in that boy’s locker room – has actually caused it to become – dare I say – unsexy.
Hard to fault depictions of women as sexual beings keeping pace with their typically hornier male counterparts and it can be fun to watch a hot chick slap bawdy repartee with the best of the bad boys, but in the humid world that is Californication, every single woman who comes in contact with Duchovny’s character, Hank Moody, unequivocally, immediately and sometimes inexplicably wants to leap into bed with him in a bad way. Every woman. Really bad.
That would be fine – given the tone and tenor of the show – if there was even a modicum of recognizable real-life behavior attached to this Cal-equation of Hank+breath+female=immediate sex, but it’s actually become a running joke in my house: timing how long it will take any new female character to drop trou for our rakishly charming but slightly skeazy anti-hero. Typically it’s within minutes. It doesn’t matter if they’re young, oldish, jail-bait, married, involved or even a Scientologist, the only requisite is that they’re breathing, willing to get naked, and hot (the chunky ones are relegated to the court-jester that is Evan Handler’s Charlie Runkle). Which poses the question: Every woman? Really?? There’s not one woman in the sphere of this character who can possibly resist his quipping, carnal come on? Apparently not.
When this season began with the introduction of Carla Gugino’s lawyer, Abby Rhodes (clever?) – whip-smart, principled and refreshingly immune to Hank’s weary act – my respect for the writers actually peaked for a moment, believing they’d come to their senses to realize the show desperately needed a shot of something different and unexpected. A hot woman who didn’t want to sleep with Hank Moody would have been both. But no. Within weeks, completely against character but utterly in lock-step with the mind-numbing mission statement of the show, even Able Abby threw her principles to the wind and her panties to the floor when Hank’s infallible appeal broke her down. Women watching around the country threw things at the TV set…and it wasn’t their underwear!
There is clearly a sociological and gender debate to be had regarding the supreme delusion perpetrated weekly on this show regarding how women respond to men. The writers (and I was stunned to learn there are two females in that lecherous group!) would have us believe that their character, Hank, is so appealing and irresistible that the breathless, boundary-less females have no choice but to succumb. Clearly it’s thought that there’s much fun to be had in reducing all female characters to rapacious sexual carnivores utterly lacking in impulse control (can we ever forget Embeth Davitz’s salivating Dean or Eva Amurri’s strip-teasing student?). Not one woman in the bunch has a moral compass, a sense of decorum or even the slightest revulsion to a male character who, while certainly of some dubious charm, also looks like he might need a good hosing down and a visit to the free clinic.
Then there’s daughter-mama, Karen, all winsome adoration and giggling forgiveness, who can’t seem to hold a position of strength for more than one angry retort or two, no matter that Duchovny’s character cyclically and grievously hurts and betrays both her and their child on a regular basis. He is always, always, forgiven with a simple flick of a grin and just the right turn of a phrase, an appallingly glib dismissal of the kind of repetitive dysfunctional behavior that, in the real world, destroys marriages, ruins relationships, sets children up for a life of turmoil, loses jobs and lands people in jail or rehab. Just look at the recent train wreck that is Charlie Sheen; his behavior is on a par with Hank Moody’s but the consequences of his behaviors offer a brutal, less charming, and much more realistic outcome. Hard to laugh along with Hank’s mischief when what is reflected in real life is so profoundly at odds with the delusional merriment.
Given its persistent story arc, it seems unlikely that much will ever change with this show. Season after season they’ll serve up dirty-mouthed men and women, hyper-sexualized nubiles, endlessly kinky conundrums, lascivious sex partners served on a platter and Hank Moody licking his grinning chops…wash, rinse, dirty, repeat, yawn. I dare you guys to give us a real-life consequence for our cop-smacking, teen-bedding Hank and perhaps a hot female character who actually finds him sophomoric, redundant and utterly resistible. A woman with spine and conviction for whom no amount of Hank-erin’ will break her down. Just try it. You might like the creative dilemmas it poses for our bad boy and, for just once, the lack of ready sex might actually be…sexy. Imagine!

March 30th, 2011 at 6:51 pm
A great blog and a very right-on critique of this show. WTF? Sometimes I wonder if all of Hollywood has gone crazy but I read this review and heaved a sigh. Not too many Hank Moody types out here so it’s a relief to know not even Hollywood folks fall for this crap.
[Reply]
LDW Reply:
March 30th, 2011 at 8:05 pm
Well, there ya have it, Skokie Joe. We’re all on the same page about old Hank! Thanks for stopping by. LDW
[Reply]
March 30th, 2011 at 3:45 pm
LOVED this article cuz I HATE this show! I will immediately grab your rss feed as I can not find your e-mail subscription link or e-newsletter service. Do you’ve any? Kindly let me know so that I could subscribe. Thanks.
[Reply]
LDW Reply:
March 30th, 2011 at 8:12 pm
Liza – the email subscription box is up in the top right hand corner of the blog’s home page…check it out and sign up. I don’t have a newsletter service but every time I post a new blog you’ll get an email. Thanks for stopping by and thanks for your continued interest! LDW
[Reply]
March 30th, 2011 at 1:43 am
I never got into this and when the actor’s personal sexual pecadillos seemed to echo the role I never looked back.
The second year of a relationship – oh, yeah, that’s the tell.
[Reply]
LDW Reply:
March 30th, 2011 at 4:47 am
It’s one of those shows that went from wild and interesting to predictably skeezy and boringly over-the-top. Funny, I posted a comment on a board at Showtime about it and man, the knives came out with the fanboys! They love them their Hank and it seems there’s many a blind eye to the sloppiness and hyperbole (and their blatantly skewed perspective on women..holy hell!) and no amount of creative logic will shake them from their Hank-love. Go figure. But then 2 1/2 Men is loved by millions and I guess that says it all about the fandom vs quality! LDW
[Reply]
March 28th, 2011 at 10:37 am
You are a great writer. You take a critique such as this (well deserved from another who finds Californication impossible to watch anymore) and put into words what the rest of us are feeling. You evidently get the message across because I stood up and applauded. Thanks!
[Reply]
LDW Reply:
March 29th, 2011 at 1:23 am
Thanks, Silva! That’s a very cool compliment and I appreciate it. Just sayin’ what’s on my mind so if it strikes a chord, all the better! LDW
[Reply]
March 28th, 2011 at 6:03 am
From a man’s point of view it’s all in good fun but i can see why women would find it ridiculous. I keep my sense of humor, which i think is the only way to enjoy this show.
[Reply]
LDW Reply:
March 28th, 2011 at 6:25 am
Uh huh. Not sure I find it as hilarious as you do! But thanks for the comment, Samuel! LDW
[Reply]
March 27th, 2011 at 9:37 pm
I read your post and felt like you were in my head. I watched this show the first season, liked it, then stopped for awhile. I came back last season and wondered what the hell happened, and this season, wow, off the rails. I agree, when the atty repping him in his legal case slept with him I knew the writers had stopped thinking through anything but their manparts, and that goes for the women writers too. Sad to watch a show lose all sense of good writing, good storytelling, even good sense. Bye bye californication.
[Reply]
LDW Reply:
March 27th, 2011 at 10:44 pm
I see we’re of like-mind, Fanny! Thanks for the comment…I agree: it’s a shame when a potentially good show loses it’s way. LDW
[Reply]