Nope. Don’t Want Robots Writing My Fiction

NaNoWriMo opens the door to AI content and all hell breaks loose.
AI Generated Image by Gianluca from Pixabay

First, for the uninitiated, NaNoWriMo stands for “National Novel Writing Month,” and it’s an annual—and, I’ve heard, sacrosanct—tradition amongst a certain contingent of writer who enjoys the challenge of churning out an entire novel (or at least the first 50,000 words) during the month of November. There are no prizes, no winners; it’s done for the sheer pride and public acknowledgment of having accomplished the task. The non-profit that conducts this event has kept it running since 1999, so clearly it’s a popular one, but as a novelist myself the idea of signing up to crank out a novel in thirty days turns the creative process into timed sport, and that just ain’t my thing.

I’m sure many who’ve participated in NaNoWriMo would tout the inspirational aspects of its mandate, one that pushes reluctant writers to “finally get to that great American novel,” or whip up the discipline to produce literature on a speed-dating timetable. But none of that is really the point of this article (though it may be of another one). No, the point of this piece is that NaNoWriMo did something this time that set the writing world on fire: It changed its stance on the admissibility of AI content and the whole damn thing blew up in their face.

Prior to this year, the organization’s policy on AI, as cited in an article by The Washington Post, was as follows:

NaNoWriMo said writers were welcome to use artificial intelligence to “assist your creative process” but that utilizing AI to “write your entire novel would defeat the purpose of the challenge.”

Then, this year, they modified that stance, as WAPO lays out:

NaNoWriMo said it would “recognize and respect writers who believe that AI tools are right for them. We recognize that some members of our community stand staunchly against AI for themselves, and that’s perfectly fine. As individuals, we have the freedom to make our own decisions.”

To condemn AI, the organization said, “would be to ignore classist and ableist issues surrounding the use of the technology,” noting that issues around the use of AI “tie to questions around privilege.” The group argued that “not all writers have the financial ability to hire humans to help at certain phases of their writing,” and that for some writers, AI is a practical solution, rather than ideological.

“Not all brains have same abilities and not all writers function at the same level of education or proficiency in the language in which they are writing,” NaNoWriMo wrote. “Some brains and ability levels require outside help or accommodations to achieve certain goals.”

[Emphases mine.]

This rambling equivocation on the topic sparked the kind of backlash that I, as an artist who finds reliance on AI to be the harbinger of doom, would have expected. NaNoWriMo’s social media blew up, people stepped down from the organization, participants quit the event, outrage against the references to “privilege” and “ableism” were heated and vitriolic. There was such an outcry that just a few short days after that announcement, the organization, clearly stunned by the backlash, issued a “note to our community,” offering an “updated” statement which basically boiled down to, “We fulfill our mission by supporting the humans doing the writing.”

Whether or not their walk-back will assuage the outrage, who knows, but all of this leads to my bigger, overarching issue: what, exactly, should the role of AI be in art?

I get that robots and AI have been essential, even lifesaving, in the arenas of medicine, technology, scientific research; bomb dismantling, etc., but why are humans so willing to abdicate their own creativity, their organizational skills, imaginations, exploratory impulses, etc., to inanimate “brains.” When is it “using tools” and when does it become like the Dillon Panthers relegating their homework to the Rally Girls and being totally, ethically okay with that arrangement (yes, I am finally catching up with the very fine Friday Night Lights)? There’s something disturbing about the trend, and the terrifying thing is that it’s only going to get more ubiquitous and accepted over time. At some point we’ll probably see whole novels written by AI “authors” available on Amazon (are they there already?). Google something and the first thing that pops up is input from AI (which I do read, but honestly? I’d prefer an intelligent human’s input). My Photoshop is now all excited about its “new and improved AI features.” Even the soon-to-be-released iPhone 16 touts it’s “built-in artificial intelligence.”

Holy hell, didn’t anybody see 2001: A Space Odyssey, when one of our very first AI characters, HAL, ominously declared, “I’m sorry, Dave, I’m afraid I can’t do that,” when directed to open the pod doors? Or what about the more recent, Ex Machina? Who could forget AVA the AI (played with banal malevolence by the fabulous Alicia Vikander) seducing the naive young scientist to set her free … to murder her creator and others, and escape to the big city where she’ll/it’ll no doubt wreak havoc on society. Or write a NaNoWriMo novel. Even Taylor Swift, in her well-timed and welcomed endorsement of Kamala Harris on debate night referenced the dangers of AI in her Instagram announcement:

“Recently I was made aware that AI of ‘me’ falsely endorsing Donald Trump’s presidential run was posted to his site. It really conjured up my fears around AI, and the dangers of spreading misinformation. It brought me to the conclusion that I need to be very transparent about my actual plans for this election as a voter. The simplest way to combat misinformation is with the truth.”

[By the way, brava, Taylor, on all the points in that paragraph!]

We’ve been tip-toeing up to and around the inevitability of robots taking on more activities and roles in the lives of us meat-bodied humans, but it seems the alarm bells set off by teams of scientists who “warn of AI dangers” has had little or no impact on starry-eyed inventors, developers, and corner-cutting humans in every profession, including the arts. Learning to fine-tune, organize, edit, and sharpen one’s prose has always been (or used to be) essential elements of a writer’s skillset. Now people dump their first drafts (or even raw ideas) into ChatGPT and let ‘er rip. Is that abdication or efficiency? Some think the latter, especially younger people, but I personally want to possess and hone those skills for myself, proficiency that comes from doing the work, over and over, until you get it right. Call me old school.

The music world has been impacted by its own version of this technological abdication for some time now. When I started as a young session singer in the ‘80s, long before ProTools and auto-tune were around, we vocalists prided ourselves on getting in the booth and laying down tracks that were so spot-on in both pitch and tone that engineers didn’t have more than a note or two to “punch in” (the ancient art of re-recording notes or bars of a vocal that the engineer would skillfully punch into the original track). Yes, that sort of thing is easier to do with auto-tune, and certainly I have no argument with using it judiciously, but what evolved from the emergence of that stellar technology is the same sort of thing we’re now seeing with AI in other creative arenas. As one recording engineer who worked with many well-known young singers told me: “They cut one or two takes, wave goodbye saying, ‘I know you’ll fix it in the mix,’ then I have to auto-tune every note, I mean every single note, and add tone corrections to make it sound decent. They’re not invested in getting to that themselves.” Even live performances can be “assisted” by auto-tune mechanics.

Not much different than letting AI help you “get answers, find inspiration and be more productive,” is it?

It’s getting harder and harder to discern what’s real anymore and that’s a bug in the system. I don’t mind if AI is used and properly credited (i.e., the artwork at the top of this piece), but how often is that the case? These days far too many “photos” and memes shared on social media either look like well-done cartoons or are so graphically ridiculous there’s no doubt of their robotic origin. Can’t say I love any of that.

I know I sound like a technological curmudgeon, an AI-Luddite, but really, I’m not. I love technology; I use it enthusiastically, appreciate it immensely (Maps has changed my life), but when it comes to my art? My creativity? My imagination and the exploration of ideas? Sorry, robot; that’s all mine.


SIDEBAR: A weekly feature where I spotlight people, projects, events, and art … sometimes even my own!

I have a friend who not only owns a stunning villa in Tuscany (where we delightfully stayed last November), but is a singular, astonishing, and highly accomplished artist, most notably in mosaics. Mia Tavonatti is the consummate creative, and I highly encourage you to click her name above to explore her work, or visit her Facebook page; even enjoy this video of the breathtaking stair project she did last year in Dana Point, CA. She hosts a slate of creative retreats throughout the year, so if the idea of exploring creativity in the stunning surrounds of Tuscany appeals to you, email her at miatav@yahoo.com for details.

ALSO: With the recent sale of one of my photographs, I was reminded of my own artwork, to which I’ve given short shrift lately as a result of my focus on literary matters. But I do love the art form, I love the work I’ve assembled on my photography site, so I want to share it with all of you. It’s an eclectic collection in various categories, so please enjoy a peruse through the galleries and don’t hesitate to let me know what jumps out at you!

Clouds Over Chicago

Joy’s Been Detected. Could It Be We’re… Happy?

I don’t know if you’ve detected it, and if you have, I don’t know if you believe it, but it’s palpable and visceral and people are starting to talk.

Photo by Jacqueline Munguía on Unsplash

It might seem crazy what I’m about to say
Sunshine she’s here, you can take a break
I’m a hot air balloon that could go to space
With the air, like I don’t care baby by the way*

We’re feeling… what is that? It’s hopeful, optimistic, communal damn JOY. Remember that, joy?

Might be hard… it’s been a while. Certainly Election 2020 being decided for Biden came with joy (or perhaps, more honestly, relief). We’ve subsequently had some very good years with Joe, get to feel happy about his estimable list of accomplishments. But Trump clamored to announce his return from the dead only days after that 2020 decision, so we knew “winter was coming” on the heels of, and during, Joe’s run. Which injected looming dread into the joy quotient, diluting it almost beyond recognition.

Because, frankly, it’s been one long, ugly slog since Trump first slithered down that escalator in 2015 (dear God, almost ten years already!). Millions have suffered specifically, millions more have suffered tangentially, and the world was not made a better place because of this corrupt little man. In fact, it’s almost as if some dark, karmic maneuvering was at play when an unprecedented global pandemic descended upon us while this corrupt little man wobbled at the helm, as if nature felt obligated to mimic the malevolent chaos swirling around him and, therefore, us. Whatever it was, it was further “nail to the coffin” of our ability to feel things like joy, hope; optimism.

Then Joe righted the ship, got us back on course, and here we are, weeks after his graceful baton pass, weeks into the exuberant Harris/Walz campaign, and it’s seems, at this point, to be undeniable:

We are feeling JOY. It’s raw and giddy, and of course, given the gap, it’s like working an atrophied muscle, exercise that can’t help but be tempered by caution, wariness, and whispered admonitions of, “Don’t get too happy, now! Remember Comey? Remember Russia? Remember misguided polls? It could all turn on a dime!”

Here come bad news talking this and that
Yeah, well, gimme all you got and
don’t hold back
Yeah, well I should probably warn you I’ll be just fine
Yeah, no offense to you don’t waste your time
Here’s why…

Yes, here’s why we won’t hold back on that joy. This is a different time, a different team, a different zeitgeist, and a wiser electorate. We’ve learned that feeling joy, letting ourselves get happy and hopeful, is its own kind of campaign adrenaline. As Joy Reid put it on Threads, “Joy is its own form of resistance.” She’s right.

And we’re allowed, dammit! The grievance and anger based agenda of Trump and his right-wing cohorts does not resonate with the majority; does not represent the mood and tone of higher conscious people; does not inspire activism, engagement, and positive outcomes. JOY DOES.

Yes, we face serious challenges. We can take nothing for granted. We can’t count on polls, pundits, or media to assess and accurately call the heats of this race. There will be shifts and changes, unexpected breaking news; creepy “swift-boating,” threats of violence (it’s MAGA, after all), and accusations of “CHEATING!” (already happening with The Corrupt Little Man Who Projects Everything). But we’ve run against this shady cabal before. We know their playbook, their players; we know the chicanery and shenanigans they’ll put into play. But our team is fierce, staffed with some of the smartest, best people in the business, and I believe we can have faith that they’ll handily respond to any lobs from the other side.

So let’s let ourselves feel it: Happiness. Hope. Optimism. Belief. JOY.

Yes, we’ll work our asses off. Yes, we’ll stay focused and activated, keep the attention on inspiring new voters, getting people registered and to the polls, helping any online and street teams reach as far as they can. But while we’re doing that, we’ll dance in the streets, sing at the top of our our lungs, and happily clap along… because this movement, this moment, is a “room without a roof”!

Because I’m happy
Clap along if you feel like a room without a roof
Because I’m happy
Clap along if you feel like happiness is the truth
Because I’m happy
Clap along if you know what happiness is to you
Because I’m happy
Clap along if you feel like that’s what you wanna do

Happy lyrics by Pharrell L. Williams © Warner-Tamerlane Publishing Corp., EMI April Music Inc., More Water From Nazareth, Waters Of Nazareth Publishing, Universal Pictures Global Music

SIDEBAR: Back when I was sending out newsletters via Mailchimp, some of you might remember they most often focused on updates regarding my books, music, photography, etc., or on other artists, events, worthy causes, or organizations I supported. Though more recently my posts have evolved into the weekly op-ed format, I still plan to include ancillary updates from time to time, and will do so through this new “SIDEBAR” feature tagged at the end of articles.

I’ll start today with some good news on the literary front: my last novel, The Alchemy of Noise, is published by a small, excellent publisher called She Writes Press, and they, just this month of August, entered into a distribution deal with the mighty Simon & Schuster, which means my book is now being distributed by that same company… which is very cool. If you’ve not yet read it, I hope you’ll trundle over to my page at their site, pick yourself up a copy, and enjoy the read.

Also, if you’re in the Chicago area: my very talented brother, Tom Amandes, is starring as “Gandalf” in The Lord of the Rings, a Musical Tale, at the Chicago Shakespeare Theater on Navy Pier. It’s getting great reviews, running until September 1st (after which it’s scheduled to go to New Zealand!), so if you can, grab some tix and immerse yourself in the magic of the Shire!


That’s it until next week… have a good one!

When Procreation Becomes Political

… tell J.D. it’s a losing position

My family. No pets allowed except turtles… but I lost one

Let me start with this: Anyone can procreate. Or, more accurately, anyone physically capable of procreating can. In fact, it’s so easy for most people that preventing procreation has made the pharmaceutical industry billions, while the need for options when procreation is considered unwise or unwanted has pushed abortion to a hot-button issue. In other words, it’s not rare, this act of human-making. It’s also not something that defines a person as either good or bad, meritorious or useless, admirable or ignoble.

Someone tell J.D. that.

I’m one of eleven children. Third oldest, third girl, then came three boys, then girl-boy-girl-boy-girl. Same two parents for all. Eleven children born over a twenty-year period. Being in that first group of three girls, growing up in an era when females were expected to be the responsible ones regardless of how many males were milling about, I was designated a “little-mommy” from an early age. Daily assisting in household tasks, family chores, occasional turtle wrangling (the only pet allowed), and the specific care of the third boy —my older sisters were likewise in charge of brothers “one” and “two,” respectively—I can say without equivocation that I know big families. Not only my own, but regular interactions with the many other big families in my small midwestern Christian/Catholic town gave me insight on a very personal level. And what I know is that big families are not the arbiter of either “it looks like so much fun!” happiness or “kill me with that many” hell on earth. They can be both. They can be one or the other. They can be neither. They can destroy a child, leave them moderately confused, or set them singing “Doe, a deer.”

I also have a child, one biological child; an event that came fairly late in my procreational window of opportunity. It took me that long to get to the decision because after the eighteen “little mommy” years of childhood, I wasn’t sure I needed further experience in the role. I’d hit the road at nineteen with a mission to live Unshackled Life like a religion, and having babies did not fit the paradigm. At all.

And let me say, those unshackled years—wild, creative; dramatic— were phenomenal. No regrets. But at some fortuitous moment I met the man I would ultimately marry, and for the first time in my life the procreational light flickered: “Oh, this is the kind of person you have children with!” I’d never met one of those before. So, madly in love and absolutely certain I was ready for the plot turn, we brought a son into the world who is and will always be my heart and soul.

But I stopped there. Just one. After growing up as I did, one was all I could mentally and emotionally manage. I knew from watching my mother struggle in her role as the “mother of many” how much not paying attention to one’s aptitude for the job could damage you. And others. So, yes: one child.

I know small families, too.

I say all this as foundation for my thoughts on the raging (enraging) pontification of a certain VP candidate who’s been spouting all kinds of Handmaid’s Tale nonsense about parenthood, framing the act of procreation as a politicized metric of human value and worth, a competition that can be judged, adjudicated; measured, and, based on participate rates, either rewarded or demonized.

In the past few weeks, Vance has come under fire for resurfaced comments attacking “childless cat ladies” as “miserable” and bad for society; claiming that childless people tend to be “deranged” and “psychotic”; and proposing giving extra voting power to parents with young children.

“We have, I believe, a civilizational crisis in this country,” Vance said at the 2021 Napa Institute event. “Even among healthy, intact families, they’re not having enough kids such that we’re going to have a long-term future in this country.”

(“Enough kids”? Sheesh. Who gets to determine that?)

Despite those views being wielded during this current political campaign, their origins sprang from a strain of theocratic nationalism that has permeated much of the Republican Party. The Slate piece quoted above—J.D. Vance Used to Be an Atheist. What He Believes Now Is Telling: He’s not an evangelical Christian. He’s a Catholic—of a very specific type— offers further insight on the particular “framework” from which J.D. now operates:

They aim to control women’s reproductive choices and individual freedoms concerning gender, sexuality, and identity; they prefer isolationist economic policies; they support unions and labor protections and oppose immigration; and they seek to elevate religious organizations’ place in their schools and civic institutions. […]

There’s a term for intellectual Catholics with a similar worldview: integralists. There’s no universally accepted platform uniting integralists; it’s more of an intellectual framework built around the idea that Catholic moral theology should govern society. Mat Schmalz, a religious studies professor at College of the Holy Cross in Worcester, Massachusetts, defined it simply as the idea of “integrating spiritual and worldly, or integrating church and state.” In other words: church before state.

(Ah, so I guess church and state would then determine what was “enough kids.” I see.)

The article’s author, Molly Olmstead, clarifies that while J.D. hasn’t fully identified as an “integralist,” some who’ve listened to him think, “Vance’s views, particularly around policing gender expression, indicate that he is at least ‘pulling from a Catholic integralist strain.’”

Which, to this former Catholic daughter from a large family who raced into independence like a starving child and believes with all my damn heart that no one—no government, no country, no religion—can impose its beliefs on any other, this viewpoint is not only regressively anti-American and terrifyingly authoritarian, it’s fucking awful, certainly when it comes to defining the worth of humans based on whether or not they’ve created other, or, even, enough, humans.

I have many friends and family members with children, many with none. I know people who’ve happily chosen not to procreate and others who’ve suffered for their inability to do so. I know those who’ve adopted, conceived by IVF, or raised other people’s kids; gay couples raising both biological and adopted children; grandparents caring for children abandoned by their parents. I know compassionate folk who’ve taken in foster kids, provided care and financial aid for children’s homes; some who volunteer for organizations focused on needy kids.

In other words, all kinds of people embodying all kinds of roles within all kinds of definitions of children, family, and care. No rules about “enough,” when, how, or why, just love, concern, and compassion.

I’m also clear that parents and caretakers can be wildly disparate in their quality of care. I know mothers and fathers who are awful people; many more who are stellar examples of the best of us. I know parents who abuse, berate, diminish, and demean, and many more who uplift, encourage, and accept unconditionally. I know childless people who can relate to and interact better with kids than some parents can. I also know childless people who, yes, do better with cats.

The point is, the choice to procreate is deeply private and personal, as is the outcome of that choice, whether it begets children or otherwise, and in what number (“enough children”… that just chafes me!). And while there are many metrics under the bubble of parenting that can indicate quality of character, community contribution, human compassion, empathy, and general “good people” qualifiers, the act alone, and the number it involves, offers no such metric.

And none of it belongs in the hands of government entities or participants, certainly not those who seek to impose their religious beliefs and tenets under the auspices of “church before state.”

Whatever memes and battle cries illustrate the contrasts of this election—which are wide and divergent—there is no denying that the Trump/Vance ticket is all about big government, invasive government; government that wants to determine every aspect of your personal life from what you read, who you love, how you identify; where you worship (or don’t), to what you do with your body, who’s allowed to care for that body, and how many other bodies your body creates. That’s not only, to repeat myself, anti-American, it’s anti-human, and it’s unacceptable.

Let’s tell J.D…. vote accordingly.


Yep… I’m a cat lady!

Visit linktr.ee/lorrainedevonwilke for links to books, music, photography & articles.

Running Like a Girl…

…with smarts, sass, and really nice shoes

Office of VP Kamala Harris, Public domain, via Wikimedia Common

When I was kid in the era of privileged mad men and women who ran things from behind the kitchen curtains, gender stereotyping was not only the norm, it was pretty much the only language we had.

Girls wore skirts to school, didn’t play “rough sports,” and were expected not to tussle with boys who were tussling with each other while sneering pejoratives like, “you fight like a girl!” or “run like a girl!” or “cry like a girl!” The theme was clear to us be-skirted ones: anything “like a girl” was dreaded status every boy I knew maneuvered hard to avoid.

Photo by Joe Pregadio on Unsplash

Yet as much as I took umbrage with the cudgel of those gender-centric insults, I oddly found perverse pleasure in comments like, “You shop like a boy,” (my dad… because I was quick about it), or “throw like a boy” (I had brothers), or, most desirously, “run like a boy” (noted by anyone who tried to keep up with me). Just as “like a girl” had currency as an insult, the reverse was considered a compliment. Why was that?

It wasn’t that I had identity or gender issues. I didn’t feel inherently less by virtue of being a girl. It wasn’t that I personally deemed girly things of no value (no one loved/loves make-up more than me). And my mother often remarked that I was “boy-crazy” from second grade on (odds are good it was first grade). It was that life regularly made clear that being on a par with boys was considered better. It had more gravitas. Carried more value. More heft.

Because boys had more agency, more power and freedom. They demanded and got more attention. Schools and towns provided for their need for athletics and clubs and social interaction far more than they did for girls. In fact, it took Title IX, a federal civil rights lawsuit enacted in 1972, to mandate that females had the right to “equal opportunity in sports in educational institutions that receive federal funds, from elementary schools to colleges and universities.” It took a damn lawsuit, for God’s sake!  

Which brings me to politics.

Why is it that a modern, global superpower like the United States of America has never elected a female president?

Well, we kinda did back in 2016 when Hillary won almost three million more votes than Trump, but given the arcane (and absurd) machinations of the Electoral College, she could not be adjudicated “the winner.” What hell that twist of fate wrought is fodder for a whole other article, but the point is: why hasn’t a woman actually won the damn thing?

Frankly, very few women have even tried. And there are reasons for that. This, from a New York Times article written shortly after the 2016 results were in, makes some astute points on the matter:

Some scholars say that European democracies may view women as more suited to high political office because their governments are known for generous social-welfare programs, something that seems maternal. In contrast, the president of the United States is primarily seen as commander in chief, which is a frame more difficult for women to fit into.

“America is still seen as the policeman of the world, the guardian of the world and we still have a very gendered version of what leadership means,” said Laura A. Liswood, secretary general of the United Nations Foundation’s Council of Women World Leaders, a network of current and former female prime ministers and presidents. “Not only do we have to be liked, we also have to be tough.”

Sue Thomas, a senior research scientist at the Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation in Santa Cruz, Calif., said that unlike political leadership posts elsewhere, the American presidency “is seen as a very masculine institution that for historical reasons is extremely hard for a female to approach.” [Emphasis mine.]

That last line makes me want to scream, so reminiscent of girls being told not to “tussle with boys” on the playground, as if those boys were untouchable and we girls were too soft or weak.

Of course, given the deeply ingrained patriarchal foundation of the modern global superpower that is the United States of America, a place where women are paid less for equal work while charged more for materials and services, some see this discussion as a form of what we used to call “affirmative action,” but is now being sneered by the right wing as “DEI.” Trump and his Republican mouthpieces wasted no time swiping at Kamala Harris’s exuberant political ascendency as a “DEI hire,” a slur both expected and repugnant, but the most blatant ignorance of that racist/sexist invective is its contrast with truth: In fact, women are actually “more effective than men in all leadership measures.”

That’s the real headline of a recent Forbes piece that goes on to say:

Research from Leadership Circle, based on assessments with over 84,000+ leaders and 1.5 million raters (comprising boss, boss’s boss, peers, direct reports, and others), shows that female leaders show up more effectively than their male counterparts across every management level and age level. [Emphasis mine.]

Cindy Adams, President and CLO at Leadership Circle, makes the following points:

“Creative leaders’ behaviors flow from their values and purpose,” Adams said, “rather than from a set of assumptions about how leaders are supposed to behave.” Creative Competencies are highly researched and validated effective leadership competencies around the world. These include competencies that scale across five dimensions:

1.     Relating

2.     Self-awareness

3.     Authenticity

4.     Systems Awareness

5.     Achieving

Yet this very illuminating article also asserts:

Despite all the measurable benefits female leaders bring to organizations, many (organizations) still do not effectively develop and support them. [Emphasis mine.]

Certainly no “organization” is larger or more complex than the Executive Branch of the United States, which, disappointingly, fits squarely into that infuriating assessment.

So what do we do about that?

We change it. We now have a female candidate for the presidency who not only embodies every competency Cindy Adams lists (as well as others detailed in the article, which I encourage you to read), but Kamala Harris is setting the town on fire in every category essential to a successful presidential campaign: stellar fundraising, rising polls, and the enlistment of enthusiastic volunteers. She’s earning key endorsements, electrifying the electorate, pulling in the youth vote, and making people feel hopeful, optimistic, and uplifted… all those thesaurus words that have to do with FEELING LIKE WE CAN ACTUALLY SAVE OUR DEMOCRACY.  

AND with a woman.

A brilliant, accomplished, fearless woman. A woman with an infectious laugh, great dance moves, a loving husband and family, and a fierce level of energy. A woman who has tussled with every kind of man in every kind of situation without losing her footing or focus. A diplomat, an advocate, a fighter.

And, by the way, we’re taking back ”like a girl,” just as we’ve taken back the American flag back from co-opting right-wingers who somehow thought they had the franchise on patriotism. We’re redefining the phrase from a sneer of misogynistic condescension to something that signifies just what a strong, self-possessed girl really is: “…self confident, productive, optimistic, a go-getter, a fear-tackler, caring, unafraid to stand up for what one believes in, proud, unbothered by what others say or think, and true to one’s self.” [from DiscoveryMood.com]

That’s Kamala Harris, a woman who has won the necessary delegates to be the official Democratic nominee; a woman who is going to change the metrics for who gets to be leader of the free world; a woman who is, indeed, “running like a girl”… a kick-ass girl with smarts, sass, and really good shoes.

Let’s get her in the Oval Office, shall we?

LDW w glasses

Visit linktr.ee/lorrainedevonwilke for links to books, music, photography & articles.

What the Grace of a Well-Passed Baton Teaches Us

… knowing when to hold ‘em, when to fold ‘em

Those of us on the side of democracy and all things sane and human had been in an unprecedented malaise in the weeks leading up to last Sunday (and you know it was bad when I start co-opting Kenny Rogers lyrics to make a point). Watching the seething beast of the Trump machine ooze its smug certainty all over the place while Democrats scratched their heads, wrote cranky op-eds, and pondered which country to abscond to next year, one wondered if there was any reasonable answer to our seemingly endless conundrum.

Then Joe made his move.

Unexpected by most, in the quiet of his own counsel, with no grand headlines or “breaking news” hysteria, he gracefully announced he was leaving the race and changed the course of history. If ever a baton-pass had more impact on modern America, I’d like to know what it was.

My son texted with the news (I was busy housecleaning in a desperate break from media). Mind blown, I responded with something unprintable here, put down my Windex, and raced to cable news (which I hadn’t watched in so long I can’t remember how long), transfixed as breathless pundits parsed what this meant, how it had transpired, what steps would follow, etc. Then Biden trumped himself (sorry… it was a word before it was a man): he endorsed his VP, Kamala Harris, as the Democratic nominee for president.

Heads exploded around the universe, and as graceful as Joe’s words and actions were, the excitement and commotion that followed were wildly hyperbolic… but in a good way this time. It was as if the doom and gloom of previous weeks (months?) lifted, and we felt true, unassailable hope for the first time in a very long time and, damn, we were so ready to run.

That, my friends, is a mic-drop baton pass.

Because it can’t have been easy. Odds are good — based on his prior statements, his feisty turnarounds after the kill-shot of the debate; his edgy dismissals of the growing demands to move along — he did not want to step down. Not a bit. He wanted to “finish the job.”

But somewhere along the way the needle tipped. I don’t know who said what to tip it; if there was a process he internalized to get there, but he came to the moment when he got up out of mid-recovery from Covid, wrote his statement, and passed it on to the world. We can presume, after the post-debate hellscape of frenzied insults and denigrations from media, the always-slathering GOP; even certain friends and neighbors in the party, that the decision, the resolve, the action, had to have kicked his gut a little. A lot. But even so… he put aside his own needs, his hurt and disappointment, and did it, transforming Election 2024 from a mosh pit of despair into a hope-infused, ever-growing march of millions toward victory (for the Democrats; Republicans are pulling out their “How To Racist 101” manuals and trying to remember which sexist tropes they liked best from “Kamala 2019”).

But here’s the thing about baton passing: it can be tricky knowing when you should, when you must, and when you damn well get to hang onto yours. Or, as Kenny Rogers said, “know when to hold ‘em, know when to fold ‘em” (I know… I’m sorry). At a time when ageism is rampant (was it ever not?), we’re aware that cultural disdain for all things old can be conveniently disguised as a benign “for your own good shove out the door leave your keys on the table go have fun, grandpa, the younger crew is on fire and they’ve got it covered” sort of thing.

Those who find value in categorizing people along arbitrary dividing lines are easily prodded into that sort of thing, pointing fingers in reductive “generation wars” for example: Boomers ruined everything, Gen Xers are whiny slackers, Millennials and Gen Z are both lazy and entitled… no one’s sure which more than the other. But as viral as those mud-fights can get, pigeonholing based on what “generation” someone falls into is both ageist and absurd, whether applied to the old or young. Where it gets sticky, and what older people face almost exclusively, is the choreography poetically defined as “passing the baton,” or “torch, or “mantle” … whatever metaphor gets an old person out the door, whether it’s warranted, the right time, or the right action.

In Biden’s case, it clearly, ultimately, was, and kudos to that wise man for figuring it out. But sometimes it’s not. Sometimes the shove is just cold, ugly ageism at work. Sometimes the shovee not only wants to continue managing the baton but is perfectly capable of doing so. Sometimes an older baton holder can peacefully co-exist with a younger one, and nobody has to pass anything.

I had to laugh at a particular moment in the Beckham documentary series on Netflix (which I loved, by the way). In the last episode, Victoria and David are in their kitchen summarizing their journeys both individually and as a couple, musing about the priority of cherishing their family, the life they’ve built together, each other, when Victoria, standing behind David, says, “There’s an element of you passing the baton on a little; you want that for your kids, wouldn’t you say?” David takes a beat, then glances over his shoulder in her direction and very seriously responds, “I’m not ready to pass the baton on yet.”

I laughed out loud because I can’t tell you how many times I’ve said those exact words to someone suggesting some version of the same to me. As an actress trying to crack that code while racing against a clock that doesn’t like older women. As a singer/songwriter fending off purportedly well-meaning suggestions of, “You must be so ready to leave it to the young ones, right?” As a writer told to hide my age lest editors decide I’m too old to have the requisite contemporary sensibilities. At each juncture, when encouraged to accept the inevitability of obsolescence, I, too, answered, “I’m not ready to pass the baton on yet.”

That’s me, bending it like Beckham.

There was a time when older generations were automatically expected to step aside, but that was back when life expectancy was shorter, anyone past mid-40s dressed like mom and dad, and health and fitness standards were considered the realm of youth. Much has changed in recent decades and in today’s world many older Americans are not only engaged and contributing via jobs and professions, they’re still exploring, still excited about new ideas and evolving opportunities. People behave younger, look younger, and remain vital longer. They’re not planning to “wind down” once they’re past the decade that begins with five. They’re less interested in tapping into their pension than continuing to contribute to one. And they see no reason to pass the baton to some younger version of themself while still happily running with the thing.

Especially given the virtual workplace of the Internet, there’s room for every generation to not only simultaneously participate, but be valued and sought after for their particular “brand,” their level of experience and worldview. Rather than shove older generations off on the ice floe of irrelevance, we should maximize their available voices to lead, guide, educate, and inspire. We can still look to our young for freshness, innovation and culturally Zeitgeisty perspective, but there’s no good reason we can’t also tap into the well of experience, talent, and wisdom of our elders.

Before Sunday’s announcement, I was all-in on Joe continuing his campaign. I didn’t need him to step down, even after the debate. I had faith it was one bad night, and enthusiastically applauded the speeches and interviews that followed, making note of his improved vigor and delivery. I continued to respect his positive contribution, understanding that he’s an almost 82-year-old man, not expecting him to be anything else, embracing him as an elder mentoring and modeling brilliant, compassionate leadership for younger politicians following in his path. But…

When he made the decision he did, I do believe — however influenced he might have been by others — it was his decision. HIS. And that made it the right one. That made it one I could get behind. Despite my sadness for whatever pain or loss he must clearly have felt, I trusted him to know it was, in that moment, the right time for him to pass the baton and he did… graciously, wisely; respectfully, to Kamala, and BOOM! The entire landscape of the election changed, making clear it was the right time and decision.

It takes great political skill to calculate and understand that kind of timing, and it takes a great leader to not only figure it out, but act on it with strategic precision. Joe Biden gave a master class on the move: the timing (post RNC… legend!), the tone, the humble respect for the needs of a nation, the sheer selflessness at a time when politics too often operates as ego-fodder for vainglorious attention-seekers. His candid, heartfelt Oval Office speech of Wednesday asked us all the right questions, was candid in expressing his initial hopes for continuing (yes, Joe, your record did merit a second term), but was clear in his understanding of the demands of this unique, urgent juncture.

He set the standard, Joe Biden, and he will be remembered by history as a great man who knew exactly when it was time to guide himself out the door.

Baton passing with grace and dignity.

I won’t ruin the gravitas of that by quoting Kenny again.

Photo courtesy of The White House, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

LDW w glasses

Visit linktr.ee/lorrainedevonwilke for links to LDW’s books, music, photography, and articles.

Celebrating Books, Libraries & Indie Authors… YAY!

It was a great weekend in San Diego, one of my favorite cities, where a celebration books, authors, libraries, and the joy of all those coming together made for a very special gathering.

Indie Author Project celebration_6.29.24

Personally, I was thrilled to step away from all the political madness of this last week (month… year!) to be part of the Indie Author Project‘s Annual Celebration honoring their 2023 winning slate of authors (which I was honored to be part of for THE ALCHEMY OF NOISE).

They threw a great party, I always love being in San Diego, and really enjoyed meeting the wonderful crew from Lyrasis, an impressive non-profit that, amongst its many projects, works with libraries around the world to bring independent authors into the fold. A special thanks to Nash Steele (what a great name!), an amazing liaison to work with who always made me feel welcome and does a great job in her position as an operations specialist with the company.

A big congratulations to all my fellow winners who were there, especially Tom Rogers, who was the other California winner (in the YA category with his book Eleven), and Kelly L. Hitchcock, a Texas winner, whose novel, Community Klepto, is also published by She Writes Press (small world!).

A great event all around and a wonderful celebration of indie authors… who always appreciate being acknowledged in this big world of books and publishing!

#indieauthors #books #IndieAuthorProject

LDW w glasses


Visit linktr.ee/lorrainedevonwilke for links to LDW’s books, music, photography, and articles.

Despite Trends to the Contrary… truth and decency still matter.

It’s fucking ridiculous that this has to be said out loud, but in our blighted era of Trumpian lunacy, when corrosiveness has been normalized, and gaslighting permeates everything from media to politics to education to social issues, it seems even the most basic expectations of principled society do have to be articulated.

Photo by Michael Carruth on Unsplash

There was a debate last night between an effective, decent, successful POTUS and a twice-impeached convicted felon who’s a pathological liar, a corrupt thug, and an adjudicated rapist, and the caterwauling afterwards—from media, pundits, terrified Democrats—is that the decent, successful man needs to “step down for the sake of the country” because he had a shitty debate. He’s too old, too “feeble”; his voice was hoarse, he didn’t counter the convicted felon’s relentless lies enough, he was pale; he lacked energy.

Huh.

So, despite the biblical list of disparities between the old fella with the big heart and the convicted felon/rapist, the loudest, the literally SHOUTED, suggestion/demand by many big name columnists, top shelf politicians; panic-stricken talking heads, was to demand the former commit political seppuku if he had any dignity or concern for his constituents. Didn’t hear one word about the convicted felon “stepping down for the sake of the country,” despite the fact that he’s articulated his plan to dismantle American democracy and his getting in the White House again would literally destroy the country as we know it.

That is a deeply systemic case of collective gaslighting.

They’re a slick bunch, gaslighters. Not just these post-debate caterwaulers, but all of them, so pervasive and relentless it’s a wonder they haven’t set the entire American experiment on fire… though it seems they’re trying. They’ve insinuated themselves into every corner of life, hiding behind church pulpits and congressional desks, in school boardrooms and medical facilities; they’re embedded in media, marketing, and Republican campaigns (even some Democratic ones, it sadly seems). They’re both blatant and surreptitious, bold and mewling; hardcore and sycophantic. And they’ve successfully manipulated a good portion of the American electorate to embrace—with blind conviction, obsequious devotion, terrifying ignorance, and ugly red hats—the belief that truth, decency, kindness, heart and humanity are not only not essential, they’re harbingers of weakness, softness, “wokeness,” unnecessary and irrelevant. This truth-averse contingent prefers their idols to be bullies, strongmen. They applaud coarseness, cheer indecorum, and hail corruption as a form of fist-pumping defiance.

The worst among them—both the gaslighters and gaslightees—are the contingent called “MAGA,” and they’re doing the dark work of trying to push Donald J. Trump back into our White House.

That cannot happen.

It’s fair to ask whether Trump is responsible for ushering in this toxic era. It feels like he did, but most would agree that MAGA was already here, just hiding beneath rocks and behind enforced social decorum. They hadn’t yet coalesced, given themselves hats and a name. It was when Trump slithered down the infamous escalator that an invitation, permission, was extended to other bigoted, small-minded, hate-and-fear oriented people to emulate his crassness. To step out of the shadows to hoot and holler and insurrect in the triggering, exciting strobe of his orange beacon. They bowed and shouted, deigned him their golden calf, and he, in turn, made them feel the power of belonging to his toxic cult. It’s a metastasizing, mutually repugnant relationship, and it’s been making American sick since 2015.

Yet still … and despite trends to the contrary … decency matters. Truth matters. Not everyone within earshot of the noise fell for the falsities. There are the millions of good people, kind people; people who care about their fellow humans, who are passionate about creating racial equity in our divided society, who see immigrants as essential members of the diverse landscape; who listen and speak with consideration, respect, and civility. People who refuse to reject truth to further lies and self-serving agendas. Who parent needy children, care for the elderly, administer schools, continue to create beautiful things, research important advances, and promote environmental improvements. People who run for office because they actually want to make life better for their constituents rather than use it to enrich and aggrandize themselves, their families, and their cronies… or stay out of prison.

These people—you, we—outnumber them.

Yet in a society where clickbait rules and salaciousness gets the attention, we spend so much time reading about, listening to, recoiling at; analyzing, reacting, and responding to the despicable, heinous words and deeds of the gaslighters it’s almost impossible to believe that the good people I’m referencing exist. Even our current president—a good, compassionate, honest man—gets less favorable, illuminating reportage than the cretin running against him … certainly as evidenced by the hysterical hand-wringing about his “disastrous debate performance.”

That won’t likely change. Our culture is too immersed in the trend of tabloid titillation. Train wrecks, political scandals, and pursuing Hunter Biden will always garner more curiosity than positive news. The only way to inject balance into that equation is to make a pact to, yes, rant, rail, and act against injustice, dishonesty, and corruption as compelled to do so, but also to shine as much light as possible on the honest, productive, integrity-inspiring people who vastly outnumber the worst amongst us who do get the headlines.

We’ve got a plate-shifting choice to make in this upcoming election. And despite the cacophony of polls and headlines that seem hellbent on amplifying the terrifying agenda and campaign of the indecent failure of a man called Trump, we have the power to push, pull, articulate, and embody the trend of decency and all that comes with it. We can holler about our individual grievances, cite examples where our causes haven’t been served to our satisfaction. We can enumerate our criticisms, opine about our disagreements, threaten to not vote, to vote third party, to “protest” vote in some self-soothing but ultimately self-sabotaging way (because I promise you, anything that helps Trump win is self-sabotaging), but at the end of the day, it’s decency that demands our attention, and that we should agree on.

Because decency is what’s at risk. Our democracy is at risk. Our rights and freedoms. Our very ability to live in a country that values those things and doesn’t gaslight its people to believe that authoritarianism, intolerance, fascism, and fear of other are acceptable principles, or that corruption, criminality, and dishonesty are simply costs of doing business.

This is no small event, this election. It’s world changing. And we can’t afford to look away. Because we do have the power to keep the terrifying echoes of Nazi Germany, Russia, North Korea, and other deadly, soul-killing, freedom-destroying political blueprints and agendas from subsuming our beloved America. Despite trends to the contrary, we have the power to make sure that doesn’t happen.

Age doesn’t matter. A bad debate performance doesn’t matter. A pale face and stumbling steps don’t matter. What matters is decency, truth, and integrity. Honesty. Upholding our American democracy. Regardless of how the Democratic leadership may respond to demands that Biden “step aside for the sake of the country,” good people who care enough about America to really pay attention, to not get lost in the weeds of debate and discord, will continue to vote like our very freedoms—the freedoms of our families, our children, our future generations—depend on it.

Because they do. And decency demands we protect those freedoms for all of us, all of them.

LDW w glasses


Visit www.lorrainedevonwilke.com for details and links to LDW’s books, music, photography, and articles.

Singing For My Democracy…

“An artist’s duty, as far as I’m concerned, is to reflect the times… How can you be an artist and not reflect the times? That, to me, is the definition of an artist.”
~ Nina Simone

It’s been a while since I’ve written here, so I hope this finds you enjoying spring and successfully making your way through 2024, a year that promises to be fierce and controversial for many of us, while offering up countless opportunities to get involved in shaping our own futures… in other words: it’s election year in the U.S. of A!

I realize that, as an artist, some don’t expect/like me to step outside that role to reveal my perspective on social and political issues, but as I explain in “The Outspoken Artist: Let Candor Be Your Brand,” I’ve never been one to separate my art from my worldview, and, in fact, believe that art and creativity are powerful tools with which to express ideas, facilitate change; inspire activism, even uplift and empower.

I bring all this up because, as illustrated by the photograph at the top, I began this year with a hearty dose of political activism when my band, Sixth & Third, organized a fundraising event at a private home, performing a 90-minute concert to a lovely crowd who enjoyed some food and drink while rocking to our music and donating a very tidy sum in support of the Biden/Harris re-election campaign. Afterward, there was much enthusiastic discussion about, “what a wonderful way to get people together, everyone involved and contributing while enjoying a great night of music!” (Thank you!) And it is, indeed, fabulous to combine political and social concerns in a format that’s entertaining, doable, and effective.

SO…

I throw this out there as an invitation and suggestion: More of these! “House Fundraisers” are not only vibrantly social and lots of fun, they’re an uncomplicated, easy way to gather likeminded people who care about essentials like democracy and decency, and want to do more to help preserve it. All that’s needed is a house or facility with space enough to set up a band/duo/combo (backyards, big living rooms, good-sized meeting spaces, etc.), a list of people you can invite, and a way to collect donations (we collected checks this time but you can set up an ActBlue donation portal, as well). I hope those of you from around the country will consider the idea, particularly as the weather gets predictably warmer and people are more apt to get out and about.

As for readers here in Los Angeles County: Sixth & Third would be delighted to play for your fundraising event if schedules allow. We always love the opportunity to perform, and you’d be hosting a wonderful night of friends, food, and music while raising funds toward saving the nation… win/win! Give it some thought; there are many months ahead in which the election will be the top story, so I hope those of you inspired by this idea will reach out to make it happen.

As for the rest of my creative endeavors: there is book stuff percolating. I’m currently putting together a compilation of short stories, essays, and other “word assemblages” to be published by early summer, and at least one of my two novel manuscripts is moving in the direction of publication (how’s that for vague? 😊). More as things unfold.

Until then, have a great spring, please stay healthy and active, and let’s do all we can to keep integrity and decency in our leadership… because Gloria Steinem’s right: “The future depends entirely on what each of us does every day.” 

LDW w glasses


Visit www.lorrainedevonwilke.com for details and links to LDW’s books, music, photography, and articles.

Phone Cameras Have Turned Everyone Into Paparazzi

Let me start with an admission: I’m a photo curmudgeon. I admit this fact. While some people LOVE having their picture taken, whether by their own hand or that of another, I do not. Some friends find this trait annoying. I often garner frowns of annoyance when I respond with a frown of annoyance at the demand to pose for a yet another selfie, but I don’t care. It’s who I am… a photo curmudgeon.

I didn’t mind photo-taking back in the days when we didn’t have an entire global population with cameras at their fingertips, hair-trigger ready to be whipped out at even the slightest hint of activity deigned photo-worthy. And planned photos, say, at a studio for that new headshot, in front of the wedding photographer with the family; occasional snaps when a rare group of friends gets together, are all just fine and dandy… I’m there, face tilted correctly, hair fluffed; smile sparkling.

But even when I was younger, prettier; more exhibitionist, and less victim to bad lighting and crappy angles, I found impromptu photo-snapping to largely be a distraction to the moment at hand. There’s just something about suddenly having a lens shoved in front of your face that breaks the spell you’re in, disrupts the conversation, distracts the parties involved, and stirs collective self-consciousness.

And while I am a curmudgeon, I’m not a cultural Luddite. I have all sorts of social media I maintain with, I hope, interesting content. I’m aware of the “live your life out loud” mandate of our times that has every pretty girl “influencing” online, all family vacations chronicled on Facebook; health updates replete with graphic proof, and Jonah Hill’s ex dumping their private conversations on Instagram. It’s the world and times we live in, and one either gets on board with all this privacy eshewel or pisses off everyone with a phone camera demanding, “let’s get one more for posterity!” Posterity didn’t need my damn face documented every moment before the first camera phone arrived in 2002; posterity doesn’t need it now, I promise.

It wouldn’t be so bad if certain standards of decorum were followed, something I wrote about years ago: e.g., get permission to post before dumping pics on social media, and only post those that capture all parties in a positive light. Meaning, we all look good enough for public consumption, not just that hot guy with your friend or, say, you. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve found photos of myself online that, while meant in goodwill, were posted without permission and captured me in the most unflattering manner possible. I believe I’m only rationally vain for a woman my age, but frankly, that’s embarrassing. I would not do that to you, I promise, so please take down that shot where my butt takes up half the screen or the shadows on my face make me look 110.

Anyway, whatever. No one really cares what I think about this because they’ll just keep taking and posting pictures regardless. But after too many experiences with regular folks who’ve turned into paparazzi with their phone cameras, I found this (above) picture of me, which made me laugh because it so honestly and accurately depicts my reaction to all this madness.

So snap away… I still won’t say “cheese.”

LDW w glasses


Visit www.lorrainedevonwilke.com for details and links to LDW’s books, music, photography, and articles.

The Trump Show: A Lie Has No Legs. Let’s Keep It That Way

As the Trump Show continues to endlessly unfold before our weary eyes (didn’t he say he’d disappear if he lost in ’20??), and I watch his followers in Congress, media, walking past me in restaurants, sputter and hiss and threaten in their various levels of outrage, I’m left pondering how so many became so convinced that this person is worthy of this degree of their histrionic fidelity.

But, really, how often do people think, really think, about their allegiances, their picks; the people, parties, and causes they get behind, identify with, march in the street and hoist placards for? I think it’s more likely that allegiance is unexamined, knee-jerk and irrational; once given, never taken away. In other words: Trumpism may be on auto-pilot.

But that’s how cultism works. I mean, you have to sign a billion-year contract in some.

I tend to think it’s wise to check in from time to time to make sure who and what I stand with still stands for ideas, concepts, and commitments I support and subscribe to. Because it occasionally happens that someone’s politics change, something new is discovered (uncovered) about them, or they jump on an unsupportable bandwagon. Examination of such shifts allows opportunity to adjust your membership accordingly.

Like, say, if a person saw that the guy they’ve sworn allegiance to was just adjudicated as a sexual abuser, or had to pay restitution to people he swindled, or got indicted for hush money paid to a porn actress, or got indicted again for 37 felony counts related to classified documents, that sort of thing. Might that signal it’s time to readjust one’s thinking?

It might, with normal people, in a normal time (whatever that is). But given the rhetoric and realities of those who loudly, aggressively, and often to their own detriment support, aggrandize, idealize, and defer to Donald Trump, it seems unlikely they ever step out of the bubble long enough to analyze, dissect, hold to the light, or check for flaws in their reasoning.

Frankly, I hope not. Because if they really did do that, and still felt as positive and passionate about the guy, it would mean our country, our American humanity, is in worse shape than I’ve given it credit for.

No, I’m writing off the insanity of Trumpism as “cult damage,” blind allegiance bereft of facts, truth, rational consideration, or critical thinking. The kind of full-body indoctrination that convinces seemingly “normal” people to reject former decent, sensible behaviors to, instead, disconnect from their families, poison themselves in Guyana jungles, murder innocent people, burn in a Waco settlement, storm the Capitol to kill the VP, mindlessly believe egregious lies, and deny any scintilla of truth if it reflects badly on their cult leader. If this is what Trumpism is, well, one can only pity the gullible… while actively protecting themselves from their wrath and stupidity, voting in every single bloody election to preserve actual democracy, and hoping one day the indoctrinated see the light of rational thought.

It happens. I extricated myself from a youthful bout of Scientology. Former Tea Party pols are now on Twitter pushing against authoritarianism generally and Trump specifically. My brother who once voted for the guy denounced him soundly last time and will again if Republicans continue to hold their bar criminally low (literally). Maybe some MAGA will wake up one day to shake off the fog of cultism to realize they hitched their wagon to the wrong orange pony. I can hope for that.

But until then (it does seem a bit idealistic), it’s essential for good people of conscience to pay close attention to what’s being foisted in the name of Dear Leader Trump:

We’re being systemically, relentlessly, unconscionably gaslit. By Republicans in Congress, right wing media personalities, and Trump analysts/lackeys/lawyers who insist that what’s criminal is no big deal, what’s dishonest is acceptable, what’s corrupt is okay, what’s indecent is dismissible, what’s traitorous is just sloppy, and what’s vile, amoral, and incendiary is just a guy blowing off steam.

None of that is true. All of it’s a lie. And a lie has no legs. Not with good people of conscience.

Donald J. Trump is, and is doing, exactly what those good people perceive. He’s lying, cheating; traitoring. He’s spewing hate, threats, and inane conspiracies far and wide. He’s blaming others for his own crimes. He’s attempting to deflect by screaming “squirrel,” hoping suspicion of others will distract from him. He’s driven by narcissism and arrogance to believe he won what he lost, deserves what he’s unqualified for; is immune to laws, excused from manners, and forgiven for indecency.

He’s not.

I grew up in a world where we were taught to admire, emulate, and support good people, men and women with integrity, smarts, honor, veracity, and compassion. Honesty was non-negotiable. Ethics were expected. Consideration and respect were the norm. I live by those standards and principles, taught my son those standards and principles, and fill my life only with people who share those standards and principles.

They are not, however, the standards and principles of those trying to gaslight this country and its people. That crowd really, really, really wants you to suck it all in, every noxious plume. They’re trying very hard to insist on it, push it, normalize it. Congresspeople tweet it, talking heads talk it; right-wing has-beens blubber about it; young Trumpist lawyers desperate to feel relevant sell their souls hawking it. And Trump, of course, is UPPER-CASING it all to death.

The only response I have: SHUT UP. SIT DOWN. ARE YOU KIDDING ME? FUCK OFF.

Sorry. I get rude with this stuff.

Like every good, decent person who’s ever held strong and pushed back against lies, propaganda, demagoguery, and disinformation throughout time, do that: hold strong, push back. Don’t get bamboozled into buying any of the noise. Whatever anyone else may be doing, whoever else may committing crimes, lying to Congress, taking bribes, stealing national security, having affairs with porn stars, or enriching themselves while in office, don’t be distracted from the truth of the current situation.

Trump is exactly who and what you think he is. And, while the “big house” may be an appropriate next stop for the guy, he can never, ever again get anywhere near our White House.

That, too, is non-negotiable.

Photo by Pawel Czerwinski on Unsplash

LDW w glasses


Visit www.lorrainedevonwilke.com for details and links to LDW’s books, music, photography, and articles.